What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. safe distance to live from cell phone tower have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
safe distance from cell tower is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.