What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, what is a safe distance from a cell tower is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.